On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:10 PM Ian Laurie <nixuser(a)mail.com> wrote:
I realize exa is still in the EPEL9 repos, was wondering if there is an
intention to move to its replacement eza as was done in F39 and F40?
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproj...
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
At a quick glance, I don't see obsoletes, provides, or conflicts in
the Fedora spec file, so it wasn't a direct replacement per se. It
was rust-exa being retired and rust-eza being added, which didn't
happen in the same release. It's up to the relevant package
maintainers (Fabio and the Rust SIG) to decide if they want to retire
rust-exa from EPEL 9 and/or add rust-eza to EPEL 9.
If retirement of rust-exa is the chosen route, an unmaintained
upstream can certainly be viewed as the underlying reason why a
maintainer would have "no desire" to keep maintaining the package in
EPEL.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-retirement/#process...
Here is a general guide for requesting packages in EPEL (tldr; file a bugzilla).
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
--
Carl George