Hi all,
I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package jsonnet.
Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b95dc99fad
Assuming no issues or objections I will push it in to the stable when possible.
Thanks, Kyle
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:38 PM Kyle Knoepfel knoepfel@fnal.gov wrote:
Hi all,
I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package jsonnet.
Bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-b95dc99fad
Assuming no issues or objections I will push it in to the stable when possible.
Thanks, Kyle _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
How compatible is this upgrade? You may need to take additional steps as detailed in the incompatible upgrade policy.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_incompatible_upgrades_policy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Package_maintenanc...
On Thu, 2021-08-05 at 10:13 -0500, Carl George wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 8:38 PM Kyle Knoepfel knoepfel@fnal.gov wrote:
Hi all,
I am rebasing nlohmann_json from 3.3.1 to 3.6.1 in epel7 to agree with the version in epel8. This change is necessary for supporting a new epel7 package jsonnet.
Bodhi update: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__bodhi.fedoraproject.org...
Assuming no issues or objections I will push it in to the stable when possible.
Thanks, Kyle _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.fedoraproject.org_... List Guidelines: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__fedoraproject.org_wiki_... List Archives: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.fedoraproject.org... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__pagure.io_fedora-2Dinfr...
How compatible is this upgrade? You may need to take additional steps as detailed in the incompatible upgrade policy.
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__fedoraproject.org_wiki_... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__fedoraproject.org_wiki_...
I'm showing the package as compatible (it is a header only package). I'm not seeing any deprecated elements, so existing users should "just work" as before.
The only EPEL7 user I found was mkvtoolnix-46.0.0-2.el7.src.rpm
Pat
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org