On Sat, 18.06.11 21:52, Aaron Sowry (aaron+rh(a)aeneby.se) wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 05:25:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> You know, I'd prefer if you take up your beef with "ls" first. Have
you
> ever compared the output of "ls" and of "ls | cat"? And
that's just the
> most obvious case.
Yes, but the difference here is that "ls" does not re-implement something that
is already available at the command line.
Hmm???
> And how does that matter for Fedora?
It doesn't I guess, but are you writing systemd for Fedora, or as a general
replacement for SysV init?
But what's the point of discussing this on fedora-devel then?
> Yes, absolutely. systemd depends on util-linux for the gettys,
for fsck,
> for mount, for umount, for swapoff, for swapon -- all these commands are
> more than just wrappers around kernel functionality and are pretty much
> the Linux API for the respective functionality.
Sure, but as far as I can tell, util-linux is not in the dependency
list.
The README of systemd lists it pretty explicitly including a version
number.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.