On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:27, nathan r. hruby wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Nils O. Sel=E5sdal?= wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:19, nathan r. hruby wrote:
>
> >
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112433
> >
> > There are also a few bugs in MySQL's bugzilla. It works, but give it
> > some load and it be slow. If you're not seeing this, please let me
> > know how you built it and your config! :)
> Did you look into the issue about mysqld possibly beeing statically
> linked ?
>
Yeah it is, so I rebuilt it on AS3 and it didn't get any better. So I
tried mysql-max which isn't static and that wasn't a whole lot better
either. I'm hoping to have tomorrow afternoon to rebuild it again with
all static options removed in vanilla MySQL and see how that goes, as
well as using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 instead of 2.4.1.
No, I meant if *your* rebuild of Mysql produces a statically linked
mysqld. If so try to get rid of it. afaik LD_ASSUME_KERNEL won't have
much effect on statically linked applications.
--
Vennlig hilsen/Best Regards
Nils Olav Selåsdal
System Engineer
UtelSystems a/s
w w w . u t e l s y s t e m s . c o m