On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Nils O. Sel=E5sdal?= wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 16:27, nathan r. hruby wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, =?ISO-8859-1?Q? Nils O. Sel=E5sdal?= wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 15:19, nathan r. hruby wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112433
> > >
> > > There are also a few bugs in MySQL's bugzilla. It works, but give it
> > > some load and it be slow. If you're not seeing this, please let me
> > > know how you built it and your config! :)
> > Did you look into the issue about mysqld possibly beeing statically
> > linked ?
> >
>
> Yeah it is, so I rebuilt it on AS3 and it didn't get any better. So I
> tried mysql-max which isn't static and that wasn't a whole lot better
> either. I'm hoping to have tomorrow afternoon to rebuild it again with
> all static options removed in vanilla MySQL and see how that goes, as
> well as using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 instead of 2.4.1.
>
No, I meant if *your* rebuild of Mysql produces a statically linked
mysqld. If so try to get rid of it. afaik LD_ASSUME_KERNEL won't have
much effect on statically linked applications.
Right, mine did, but mysql-max which is also built isn't (AFIK). I'll be
rebuilding again tomorrow the non max version dynamically to see what the
deal is.
-n
--
-------------------------------------------
nathan hruby <nhruby(a)uga.edu>
uga enterprise information technology services
production systems support
metaphysically wrinkle-free
-------------------------------------------