On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:02:39PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 12:32 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Brian Pepple wrote:
> > Looking at the stats the top 5 reviewers did something like 44% of all
> > package reviews. One of the things I'd like to work on improving in
> > 2009 is to increase the number of reviews done by the folks that did 10
> > or fewer reviews in 2008, since this is where the bulk of our package
> > reviewers lie.
> I don't want to short the "long tail" of reviewers, so perhaps we
> could arrange for a smaller but still significant reward for people
> who did more than "N" reviews.
Yeah, we briefly discussed in the Package Review sig perhaps having a
random drawing of folks that completed x-number of reviews for a period
of time (something like 3 months), and sending them some form of Fedora
Perhaps this would be a good compromise -- using randomization to
eliminate bias that favors quantity of simpler reviews.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
- - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug