On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and it
> sure seems pretty reasonable to expect that people with commit access to
> Fedora packages are able to purchase a $25 or 30€ security key [1][2].
Having to pay even $25 for a hobby project is not acceptable, IMO. If
you want to enforce such a policy, find sponsors and buy devices for all
Fedora contributors.
Fedora must be looked at as more than just a "hobby project" even though
it
is a hobby for some.
It's an OS that many rely on and $25 is a somewhat trivial cost for
improved security.
With your suggestion of sponsors to cover such devices - how does that work
for new packagers? It seems pretty impossible to do such a thing and tons
of money would simply be wasted on packagers that did very little to
nothing after becoming a packager.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly(a)easycoding.org)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <
https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>