On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 3:52 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On 06/09/2022 19:49, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Of course, hardware authenticators would be even more secure, and it
> sure seems pretty reasonable to expect that people with commit access to
> Fedora packages are able to purchase a $25 or 30€ security key [1][2].

Having to pay even $25 for a hobby project is not acceptable, IMO. If
you want to enforce such a policy, find sponsors and buy devices for all
Fedora contributors.
Fedora must be looked at as more than just a "hobby project" even though it is a hobby for some.

It's an OS that many rely on and $25 is a somewhat trivial cost for improved security.

With your suggestion of sponsors to cover such devices - how does that work for new packagers?  It seems pretty impossible to do such a thing and tons of money would simply be wasted on packagers that did very little to nothing after becoming a packager.

--
Sincerely,
   Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@easycoding.org)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat