Am 05.05.2013 16:54, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Sun, 05 May 2013 16:51:24 +0200
Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
>
> why would anybody mount it only on access to make the setup
> useless more fragile?
Free resources for the nfs connected
clients who will be reading
the /shareyumcache
what do you image happens if they read it and you
use on-access mount? it get's mounted anyway because
that is the definition of "on access"
do what you want, i have enough expierience to not
use such things if the are not HARDLY needed and had
even crashes on virtual servers due backup-snapshots
with automounts, but your game
https://www.google.com/search?q=systemd+automount