On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 23:09:57 +1030
Tim <ignored_mailbox(a)yahoo.com.au> wrote:
Because those applications are written by people who do not know
what
they're doing (*). It's one thing for a poorly written application to
not bother to insert headers that the programmer didn't understand, so
that further thread sorting fails. But it's another thing, altogether,
to go as far as removing important headers that were already there.
Thakns Tim for the reply. This shows how much I know, not much:-)
I was under the the impression that companies and devs would make it a priority
to write software that would meet all the standards to minimize any problems
like thread breaking; for people who likes to sort their email in a threaded
fashion.
People who write software without adhering to, or even looking up
specifications.
If you've been doing email, or usenet, for as long as I have, and
many
others, it becomes readily apparent at just how many user agents are
appallingly crap. They get all manner of things wrong, and don't care,
"because it works for me." It's one thing to write your own bad
software, it's much worse to foist it upon everyone else.
I have never used usenet and I have only used Thunderbird and untill
recently windows phone email client and i already think Windows Phone
email client stinks because it breaks threads. I just began
using Sylpheed on Fedora the other day, well see how that goes.
Thanks again for the reply and explanation.
--
Edward M <edwardm1(a)live.com>