-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 31 January 2004 05:42 am, Markku Kolkka wrote:
Michael Fratoni kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika lauantai 31.
tammikuuta 2004 04:37):
> I missed the start of this thread, but does "ntpdate <server>"
> not do what you want?
The ntpdate manpage says:
"The functionality of this program is now available in the ntpd
program. See the -q command line option in the ntpd - Network
Time Protocol (NTP) daemon page. After a suitable period of
mourning, the ntpdate program is to be retired from this
distribution"
So it does. I haven't checked the man page for quite some time, and wasn't
aware of this. Doing a little checking, ntp -q may provide the same
functionality and more accuracy, but it's not quite as simple. It'll be a
shame to see ntpdate removed. ntpdate is easier and more than accurate
enough for the vast majority of systems.
As near as I can tell, ntp -q requires ntp to be configured via
/etc/ntp.conf, and then each call to ntp -q takes 30 - 60 seconds to
complete.
The only change needed from the default config file was the definition of
a server line with the iburst keyword:
"server 192.168.0.3 iburst"
[root@snakebyte root]# time ntpd -q
ntpd: time slew -0.010097s
real 0m42.001s
user 0m0.020s
sys 0m0.030s
[root@snakebyte root]#
As the subject says, the thread was about how to actually replace
ntpdate with a call to "ntpd -q".
Yes, sorry for the confussion. The sheer volume of list mail of late has
been a bit overwhelming. I've been deleting large message blocks unread
with only a cursory look at the subjects.
- --
- -Michael
pgp key:
http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0|9 in 8M of RAM:
http://www.rule-project.org/en/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAG849n/07WoAb/SsRAhtZAJ9OlbmJnuCrVdUgg8/npgUrvBom0QCfXCMu
H455U92vL4POMpuUKG92T9s=
=gQpb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----