On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:47 PM, Greg Woods <woods(a)ucar.edu> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Joe Zeff <joe(a)zeff.us> wrote:
> On 07/30/2017 01:54 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
>
>> It looks like some warnings are being treated as errors, such as an
>> implicit function declaration in this case. Is there a way I can turn that
>> off just long enough to get this module built? I'm stuck running a
>> non-updateable kernel until I can find a way around this. In my early
>> career I used to build stuff all the time, but it has been a while since I
>> have had to compile anything from source.
>>
>
> Have you discussed this with the people who wrote and maintain this?
>
I did what I probably should have done in the first place: I posted this
to the asterisk list. And it turns out someone does have a patched src rpm.
When I get some time later this week, I'll try it out, because I definitely
don't want to be running a kernel that I can't update.
Just to close out this thread in case someone encounters it in the archives
later: I was able to find some patch files inside the source RPM at
https://messinet.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/26/SRPMS/
This also contains the 2.11 version of the dahdi-linux module. After
refreshing my memory on how to use the patch program, I was able to apply
the patches and build the module for the latest F24 kernel
(4.11.12-100.fc24.x86_64) and it is working. Hopefully I can now proceed to
upgrade the asterisk server box to F25 and then F26, and build the dahdi
module for those kernels.
--Greg