Send users mailing list submissions to
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
users-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
users-owner(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Samba config - (Bob Goodwin)
2. Re: Output text color (was dnf list color bad) (Todd Zullinger)
3. Re: Samba config - (Ed Greshko)
4. Re: setting up PPPoE on fedora with recent network tools
(Patrick Mansfield)
5. Re: Output text color (was dnf list color bad) (Beartooth)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:46:52 -0400
From: Bob Goodwin <bobgoodwin(a)fastmail.us>
Subject: Re: Samba config -
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <16d9a7a5-ba27-5769-a694-fffffed28d72(a)fastmail.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 2020-07-05 10:48, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Check the settings on 192.168.50.149
> Also, what do you get when you do....
>
> smbclient -L 192.168.50.149 -U bobg
>
> You will be prompted for your smb password on the remote system.
.
> [bobg@WS1 ~]$ smbclient -L 192.168.50.149 -U bobg
> Enter SAMBA\bobg's password:
>
>    Sharename      Type     Comment
> Â Â Â ---------Â Â Â Â Â Â ----Â Â Â Â Â -------
>    print$         Disk     Printer Drivers
> Â Â Â IPC$Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â IPCÂ Â Â Â Â Â IPC Service (Samba
> 4.12.3)
>    bobg           Disk     Home Directories
> SMB1 disabled -- no workgroup available
Not sure what it wants from SMB1 or why whatever it is is disabled? I
probably need to enter something for that but do not have any Windows to
deal with here ...
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www.qrz.com/db/W2BOD
FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 12:59:10 -0400
From: Todd Zullinger <tmz(a)pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Output text color (was dnf list color bad)
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <20200705165910.GN6611(a)pobox.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Z58pRedRDwOEwTeD"
--Z58pRedRDwOEwTeD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Beartooth wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:02:40 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 7/3/20 11:59 AM, Beartooth wrote:
>>> That one is the color dnf upgrade uses to list what it proposes to
>>> change. (What it reports while making the changes is fine.) At present
>>> it shows bright chartreuse on pale blue -- which just fuzzes out.
>>=20
>> If the only problem is the one color from dnf, then either disable dnf
>> colors or use the information from the last thread to adjust the color
>> that's causing the problem.
>=20
> I found /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS, /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.256color, and=20
> /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS.lightbgcolor.
I'm pretty sure those are in /etc, not /etc/dnf. If they're
in the latter, can you confirm that and check what package
provides them (rpm -qf /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS*)? I don't see
anything providing them.
> In the first one, I found among much else=20
> # If you use DOS-style suffixes, you may want to uncomment the
> following:
> #.cmd 01;32 # executables (bright green) I changed 32 to 31; removed=20
> both hashmarks; no joy; rebooted; still no joy.
>=20
> Am I editing the wrong file? That comment about suffixes doesn't=20
> quite sit right, but I didn't see anything else that looked likelier.
Assuming you really meant /etc/DIR_COLORS*, then to be
clear, 1) that will affect ls rather than dnf; and 2) you
_are_ most likely editing the wrong file if you edit
/etc/DIR_COLORS.
The logic for which of the 3 files is used is in
/etc/profile.d/colorls.sh (for bourne-style shells like
bash). Most modern terminal support 256 colors (at least),
so they'll most likely use /etc/DIR_COLORS.256color.
After you edit it, you must source /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh
to pick up the changes.
You can also copy the proper DIR_COLORS* file to your home
dir to avoid having a clean install overwrite your changes
in /etc. The paths which the colorls.sh script uses are:
$HOME/.dir_colors.$TERM
$HOME/.dircolors.$TERM
$HOME/.dir_colors
$HOME/.dircolors
The first one found is used.
--=20
Todd
--Z58pRedRDwOEwTeD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iQFEBAEBCAAuBQJfAgbeJxhodHRwczovL3d3dy5wb2JveC5jb20vfnRtei9wZ3Av
dG16LmFzYwAKCRBDJZOLvq8M495uCAC1ibv9QCPF4jp2BcTrefdlhhYzv8uwftLl
LYoPtnPBjND/BoPnQnWmR7fGEQIeS7wvxwsFJWZolbJ4sj0PEXRD6/P9liUn2fu1
zrbFAPwX7mkVE0ek52iw9oGYclycrrRerJSx7SgGAoYnWy+thMtgvG0d04nDXg6A
yqRtDykVmIBXGcvmH/WzGQCDroRihvIxrcEBmSnHLbWcpB+TYR2sEw485wRxaKjE
zyeMv2ly5+LFzu+0+tbw1qXLUv8Y18SYnF+t/u9ypGvVqwosLXCKQGJcULiHyP/3
nDBZ2NSibiSVscMeh7RS/sgFiaOrCSF4YgbYVZMcn55haUwhboWl
=ZoDG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Z58pRedRDwOEwTeD--
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 01:02:17 +0800
From: Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com>
Subject: Re: Samba config -
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <05252b8e-2848-4fac-67b2-72503fd79219(a)greshko.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
On 2020-07-06 00:46, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-07-05 10:48, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Check the settings on 192.168.50.149
>> Also, what do you get when you do....
>>
>> smbclient -L 192.168.50.149 -U bobg
>>
>> You will be prompted for your smb password on the remote system.
> .
>> [bobg@WS1 ~]$ smbclient -L 192.168.50.149 -U bobg
>> Enter SAMBA\bobg's password:
>>
>>    Sharename      Type     Comment
>> Â Â Â ---------Â Â Â Â Â Â ----Â Â Â Â Â -------
>>    print$         Disk     Printer Drivers
>> Â Â Â IPC$Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â IPCÂ Â Â Â Â Â IPC Service (Samba
>> 4.12.3)
>>    bobg           Disk     Home Directories
>> SMB1 disabled -- no workgroup available
>
> Not sure what it wants from SMB1 or why whatever it is is disabled? I
> probably need to enter something for that but do not have any Windows to
> deal with here ...
>
That's not important.
What is is Sharename=bobg.
So, on WS1 the command would be....
mount -o uid=bobg,credentials=/home/bobg/cred //192.168.50.149/bobg
/media/smb
And back to sleep I go.....
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 10:29:02 -0700
From: Patrick Mansfield <patmans(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: setting up PPPoE on fedora with recent network tools
To: Community support for Fedora users <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Message-ID: <20200705172902.GA1121049@umbrella>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 10:19:32AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-07-04 04:19, Patrick Mansfield via users wrote:
> > Anyone know where to find details setting up and using a PPPoE client
> on fedora with
> > current network tools?
> >
> > I used nm-connection-editor to add one, but haven't figured out how to
> actually bring
> > it up nor if it's actually working.
> >
> > I installed rp-pppoe, I'm not sure if it's needed or if it's
> integrated with NM.
>
> Well, if you've set it up then you should be able see it in the list
> when you issue
>
> nmcli connection
>
> The details will be shown if you do...
>
> nmcli connection show name-of-connection
>
> And then....
>
> nmcli connection up
>
> will attempt to bring up the connection.� The results should be
> displayed and you can check the
> journal for any error messages.
Ah, thanks: I had tried to bring it up using nmcli, but missed this error:
Jul 04 10:53:23 umbrella NetworkManager[1183]: <warn> [1593885203.4348]
device (wan0): PPPoE failed to start: the PPP plugin
/usr/lib64/NetworkManager/1.20.12-1.fc31/libnm-ppp-plugin.so is not
installed
I installed it:
dnf install NetworkManager-ppp
And was able to get PPPoE working.
I don't think rp-pppoe is needed, but have left it installed for now.
PITA as I'm trying to get rid of my combined modem router (actiontech
C3000A) with
new Centurylink internet service, and I can't modify the modem settings
once I put
it in bridge mode - it has to be physically reset if I want to change
anything, like
put it back to PPPoE mode, or to disable the VLAN.
-- Patrick
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 17:52:56 -0000 (UTC)
From: Beartooth <Beartooth(a)comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Output text color (was dnf list color bad)
To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <rdt41o$2i6$2(a)ciao.gmane.io>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, 05 Jul 2020 12:59:10 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
[....]
> I'm pretty sure those are in /etc, not /etc/dnf. If they're in the
> latter, can you confirm that and check what package provides them (rpm
> -qf /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS*)? I don't see anything providing them.
You're right. My bad. They're in /etc. And I get # rpm -qf /etc/
dnf/DIR_COLORS*
error: file /etc/dnf/DIR_COLORS*: No such file or directory
>> In the first one, I found among much else
>> # If you use DOS-style suffixes, you may want to uncomment the
>> following:
>> #.cmd 01;32 # executables (bright green) I changed 32 to 31; removed
>> both hashmarks; no joy; rebooted; still no joy.
>>
>> Am I editing the wrong file? That comment about suffixes doesn't
>> quite sit right, but I didn't see anything else that looked likelier.
>
> Assuming you really meant /etc/DIR_COLORS*, then to be clear, 1) that
> will affect ls rather than dnf; and 2) you _are_ most likely editing the
> wrong file if you edit /etc/DIR_COLORS.
>
> The logic for which of the 3 files is used is in
> /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh (for bourne-style shells like bash). Most
> modern terminal support 256 colors (at least), so they'll most likely
> use /etc/DIR_COLORS.256color.
Am I remembering wrong? Istr that I could tell a given machine
*once* that I want to see dot files, and it would *always* display them.
> After you edit it, you must source /etc/profile.d/colorls.sh to pick up
> the changes.
"source" is a verb?? Sorry -- you lost me. What does it mean?
> You can also copy the proper DIR_COLORS* file to your home dir to avoid
> having a clean install overwrite your changes in /etc. The paths which
> the colorls.sh script uses are:
>
> $HOME/.dir_colors.$TERM $HOME/.dircolors.$TERM $HOME/.dir_colors
> $HOME/.dircolors
>
> The first one found is used.
Sigh. The curse of the autodidact strikes again. I know that
"HOME" in all upper case has a standard meaning, and I suppose
"TERM"
must, too. But I can never remember what it is, nor where to look it up.
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
------------------------------
End of users Digest, Vol 197, Issue 33
**************************************