----- Original Message -----
From: "Christofer C. Bell" <christofer.c.bell(a)gmail.com>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: FC3 on Dell PowerEdge 2800 and embedded SCSI and
10/100/1000NICs ?
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:09:15 -0600, Thomas Cameron
<thomas.cameron(a)camerontech.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McGuffey, David" <DAVID.C.MCGUFFEY(a)saic.com>
> >
> > Anyone running FC3 on this fairly generic box? Any problems? Any
> > recommendations for a better box at the same or less cost?
>
> An observation: posting multiple questions in a single message tends to
> turn folks like me off. I've found that I am more likely to answer a
> single
> question... So if you have three issues you are dealing with, I suggest
> posting three messages.
>
> I could be wrong tho...
So you are seriously suggesting that David post separate messages for
the following questions?
o Any trouble running FC3 on this fairly generic box?
o Any problems (running FC3 on this fairly generic box)?[1]
o Any recommendations for a better box at the same or less cost?
You honestly believe these questions are unrelated enough to warrant
three separate posts? Heck, I've just asked you the same question
twice, perhaps I should have broken it into two posts.
No, no - I meant that asking about openwall, grsecurity, PAX, LIDS, and
Bastille might be best done one post per topic (i.e. an openwall post, a
gesecurity post, a PAX post and a LIDS post). This assumes that the OP is
asking about technical questions about each topic. A question like "hey, do
you like SELinux or Bastille better?" would probably be a logical singel
post, but "how do I configure Bastille" and "how do I configure
SELinux"
would be better as separate questions.
Make sense?
TC