On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:27:34AM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
akonstam@trinity.edu wrote:
Well I guess all this is a matter of opinion. To me the response to a complaint of "that is how we always did it" is puerile. You seem to be the redhat representative in this discussion it seems to me you could spend some of your time communicating to the "powers" about our feelings than just defending the decision blindly.
It doesn't seem to me that this is what Rahul is doing. He's pointing out that this is not the right forum. His claim (IIUI) is that the people who need to see these messages for the most part don't take time to read this forum. He's suggested a place to post where they do read, so...
After all your explanations I can't understand why it would hurt anything or anyone to delay the movement of FC3 to legacy until after FC5 release. People in the "community" are saying that this decision makes it more difficult for them.
This follows multiple decisions the RedHat has made that the list members have felt was wrong and not once have I detected a willingness on Red Hat's part to reconsider the decision.
Did you put any of your concerns where Rahul said they would have effect?
Ok, I can take a hint.