On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:11 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
"Patrick" == Patrick O'Callaghan pocallaghan@gmail.com writes:
Patrick> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:23 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote: >> >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan@gmail.com> >> writes: >> Patrick> On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:02 +0100, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams colin@colina.demon.co.uk
>> >> writes: >> >> Colin> I dare say libusb may well have been updated during the Colin> last week. It is currently at libusb-0.1.12-15.fc9.x86_64 . >> >> >> >> If I do rpm -q -i on it it says the install date is in >> May. I >> suspect that is when I installed Fedora 9. But I >> don't see an >> update date. >> Patrick> grep libusb /var/log/yum.log >> >> Nothing. Patrick> Aaaaaarrrrrrrrgggghhhhh. Encroaching senility. I meant
I'll race you :-)
Patrick> udev, not libusb. You want udev-124-1.fc9.2.x86_64
That's what I have. It was updated yesterday. Hm. Sounds suspicious.
How do I revert to .1.x86_64?
As I understand it yesterday's update was meant as a temporary fix to a problem introduced a few days ago, so *in theory* it shouldn't be the cause of your problem. Of course if you discover that it is then definitely report it to Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451320
If you want to revert, you probably still have the old package in /var/cache/yum, so "rpm --oldpackage ..." should be able to install it (modulo any dependencies).
poc