I noticed this yesterday and have been excluding these:
[root@Box10 bobg]# dnf upgrade Last metadata expiration check performed 0:23:34 ago on Fri Nov 13 02:28:50 2015. Dependencies resolved. ======================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================================================================== Upgrading: rpm x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 509 k rpm-build-libs x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 115 k rpm-libs x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 293 k rpm-plugin-selinux x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 50 k rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 50 k rpm-python x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 99 k rpm-python3 x86_64 4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc23 updates 100 k
Transaction Summary
Upgrade 7 Packages
Total download size: 1.2 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted.
I've gone through /etc/yum.repos.d/ and have testing and rawhide set to enabled=0 in each of the following:
[root@Box10 bobg]# ll /etc/yum.repos.d/ total 48 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 183 Apr 1 2011 adobe-linux-x86_64.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1255 Oct 19 23:41 fedora.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1270 Oct 19 23:41 fedora-updates.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1328 Oct 19 23:41 fedora-updates-testing.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1241 Oct 24 11:38 rpmfusion-free-rawhide.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1172 Oct 24 11:38 rpmfusion-free.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1170 Oct 24 11:43 rpmfusion-free-updates.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1230 Nov 12 03:57 rpmfusion-free-updates-testing.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1295 May 1 2015 rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1217 May 1 2015 rpmfusion-nonfree.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1215 Oct 24 16:09 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates.repo -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1275 Nov 13 02:40 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing.repo
However it continues to want to update a few with the rc1 rpm's which seems inadvisable ...
What am I missing?
This installation began as Fedora-23 beta and seems to work perfectly otherwise. As I said I first noticed this yesterday.
Bob