On 04/18/2010 07:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
As I sometimes am, I am confused by what you say Rahul. The question is not whether Red Hat has a right to replace programs by new ones created by another different team of volunteers. They do.
I wasn't answering you. It was a reply to Tom Horsley.
My question is why call the new project seahorse a name which would be hard to associate with what the program does. Is there some reason that the new program could not keep the same name or at least a more meaningful name?
Two projects obviously can't have the same name. The name is a word play. Developers can pick whatever name they want. If you don't like it, feel free to talk to them. Downstream distributions have no say on that.
Rahul