On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 10:54:35PM +0000, Amadeus W.M. wrote:
> I'm not talking about the desktop, choosing one or another is trivial.
> I'm talking about install time. I installed F22 from the live iso
> (the only available), and I had no choice of customizing what's being
> installed. Maybe I missed something or maybe I chose the wrong install
> source.
The emphasis is on getting you to a basic running system quickly, with
as few questions as possible. Once there, you have much more powerful
options for adding software, and it's available whenever is convenient.
Why duplicate this at install time?
More to the point, I don't think the Live images ever offered a choice.
That's kind-of the idea about live images. When you install from them,
you get the exact same system that you would get if you were to boot
from it. I would try the netinstall image to get choices.
I believe, there was some talk of having updated live images from time
to time during the lifetime of a Fedora release, to aid installing an
updated Fedora version easier. It was abandoned as it required more
effort than available.
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.