On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Martín Marqués
<martin.marques(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2009/2/16 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu>:
> Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
>
>> Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko(a)greshko.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Took a quick look at
http://pim.kde.org/akonadi/ and on the surface
>> > seems like a reasonable direction/idea. So, not quite sure as to why
>> > you may consider this to be a big issue.
>>
>> If every applications starts its own copy of mysql\
>
> In this caes, it's one mysql instance for akonadi, which all akonadi-using
> apps will share (per user, by default).
I think he was talking about other apps (non-KDE ones). Say I start
emacs and it want's to store cache and configuration info in a mysql
database, or I want to use rythmbox (which is a GNOME app) and GNOME
start's it's own mysql instance.
IMHO, this is the beginning of the end of KDE
Because some portions of it require a free database engine? Seriously?
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
(
www.pembo13.com )