Am 05.04.2012 22:32, schrieb Tom Horsley:
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:38:24 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> this is NOT how improvement looks
Even more fun, there has been at least one update to
the biosdevname package that caused it to generate
different "fixed" names than it previously generated.
So much for the stated goal of the project...
It really would make vastly more sense to have
retained support for the persistent-net rules
generation while using biosdevname to provide
the initial names recorded in the file.
That way, if I wanted a different name, I
could edit the file and get it.
well, but how to act that fedora developers realize
that their "improvements" are often not more and
not less as damage to well working things?
everytime you tell tehm they are pissed off and will not believe
that the world is not turning only around their mantra
"change for the sake of the change"