postfix and selinux
by Ranjan Maitra
Hi,
I have selinux enforcing and postfix for mail delivery. It turns out that postfix does not "work" if selinux is enabled (setenforce 0 selinux sets it to work again).
However, I don't really want to leave selinux in disabled mode. So, I was looking around and found the following:
https://linux.die.net/man/8/postfix_virtual_selinux
which says that:
semanage permissive -a postfix_virtual_t
which allows for postfix to be permissive. Is this all that is needed?
I also came across this page:
https://www.bitdefender.com/support/how-to-configure-selinux-when-using-p...
but I am not sure: are these the best ways to use postfix with selinux on F31?
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
4 years, 1 month
Panel editing
by Frank Elsner
Hello,
how to remove an item from panel which doesn't offer "remove from panel"
on right click? The desktop is MATE.
--Frank
4 years, 1 month
rsync error... can i ask for help here??
by bruce
Hey group.
I've got an rsync error that I can't seem to resolve. Did the
google/testing etc.. no dice so far. Even did the irc centos chat... what a
clusterphk.
Is it ok to ask here?
thanks
4 years, 1 month
no file system or encrypted interface on d-bus object
by ToddAndMargo
Hi All,
This is going to seem like a Windows question, but it
will turn into a Fedora question. I promise.
I had a customer yesterday with a brand new Lenovo P53s
laptop. His old laptop died on a grand scale. I was
able to remove his old hard drive and mount in on
a USB3 carrier to plug into his new laptop.
The drive was pretty badly corrupted and Windows 10 kept
trying to index it over and over and over. So I booted
into Fedora 31 from a flash drive.
Now his local drive (not the bad one from the old laptop)
would not mount (500GB NVMe). The error was:
no file system or encrypted interface on
d-bus object
Huh?
I was able to retrieve most of his data by copying to
another USB3 flash drive, then booting back into
Windows.
Anyway, what the heck error message was that? And
how do I work around it? I need to be able to mount
drive that are installed in laptops with Fedora to
recover data.
Many thanks,
-T
4 years, 1 month
New bugzilla install - httpd error - Possibly OT
by S.Bob
All;
Apologies if this is OT:
I'm setting up a new VM with Bugzilla.
I've done the install of prerequisites and installed bugzilla in
/var/www/html/bugzilla on a CentOS 7 64bit OS.
I've installed PostgreSQL 11, created the bug user, added the following
to the localconfig file
$db_driver = 'pg';
$db_host = 'localhost';
$db_name = 'bugs';
running ./checksetup.pl in /var/www/html/bugzilla (as root) succeeds:
# ./checksetup.pl
* This is Bugzilla 5.0.6 on perl 5.16.3
* Running on Linux 3.10.0-1062.18.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 17
23:49:17 UTC 2020
Checking perl modules...
Checking for CGI.pm (v3.51) ok: found v3.63
Checking for Digest-SHA (any) ok: found v5.85
Checking for TimeDate (v2.23) ok: found v2.24
Checking for DateTime (v0.75) ok: found v1.04
Checking for DateTime-TimeZone (v1.64) ok: found v1.70
Checking for DBI (v1.614) ok: found v1.627
Checking for Template-Toolkit (v2.24) ok: found v2.24
Checking for Email-Sender (v1.300011) ok: found v1.300034
Checking for Email-MIME (v1.904) ok: found v1.926
Checking for URI (v1.55) ok: found v1.60
...
Checking for DBD-Pg (v2.17.2) ok: found v2.19.3
Removing existing compiled templates...
Precompiling templates...done.
Fixing file permissions...
Now that you have installed Bugzilla, you should visit the 'Parameters'
page (linked in the footer of the Administrator account) to ensure it
is set up as you wish - this includes setting the 'urlbase' option to
the correct URL.
checksetup.pl complete
My /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf file contains this:
<Directory "/var/www/html">
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
#AllowOverride None
Require all granted
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Options +Indexes +ExecCGI
DirectoryIndex index.cgi
AllowOverride Limit
</Directory>
<Directory "/var/www/html/bugzilla">
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
#AllowOverride None
Require all granted
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Options +Indexes +ExecCGI
DirectoryIndex index.cgi
AllowOverride Limit
</Directory>
However, when I run testserver.pl from /var/www/html/bugzilla:
# ./testserver.pl http://10.16.0.109/bugzilla
I get this:
# ./testserver.pl http://10.16.0.109/bugzilla
TEST-OK Webserver is running under group id in $webservergroup.
TEST-FAILED Fetch of images/padlock.png failed
Your web server could not fetch
http://10.16.0.109/bugzilla/images/padlock.png.
Check your web server configuration and try again.
I've read and googled but not found the issue
Thanks in advance for any help
--
`When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*".' (By Linus Torvalds)
4 years, 1 month
some Rawhide feedback
by David
Today's update, went smoothly for my install of Workstation.
My kernel is now: 5.7.0-0.rc1.20200414git8632e9b5645b.1.fc33
My backup kernel is: 5.7.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc33
And my emergency kernel is the crusty old 5.7.0-0.rc0.git8.1.fc33
The only fc31 package on my install is TrouSerS.
I have a new point-release of Firefox. Why out of all the packages
that
gets updated is Firefox the most finicky ? and requiring a reboot ?
Several packages got bumped up this week from the fc32 to the fc33
category. Among them was gnucash. ( But mine is a flathub flatpak )
Cups is now fc33, except for the two packages below:
cups-pk-helper.x86_64 0.2.6-9.fc32
cura-lulzbot.noarch 1:3.6.21-3.fc32
There are still some stale crusty bread lying around:
gnome-themes-extra.x86_64 3.28-7.fc32
but nothing else easily noticeable. I am joking sarcastically,
but about half of the lib**** packages ( dependencies ?? )
are all still fc32, which is normal at this early stage in the flow
of things.
All and all, I am betting Fedora 33 is going to be the best release
yet.
Mine boots up quickly and reliably, and has been stable since installation
( new fresh install about a week or two ago ).
David Locklear
Rawhide Novice
4 years, 1 month
Question On Mingw Binaries
by Thomas Dineen
Gentle People:
I normally use CentOS7, but I was disappointed to discover that RH
had removed the mingw binaries from their normal CentOS Archive.
Claiming that they were out of date and full of bugs and security holes?
Hmmmm?
RH said to use the Fedora Mingw binaries, but did not say which ones?
Should I use the F19 version because CentOS7 is based on F19?
Or should I use the F28 Binaries to get the newer version (newer version
prefered but not required)?
Can I even use the newer version?
Thank You
Thomas Dineen
4 years, 1 month