Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
Greg Ennis
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
Yes, but on x86_64. It installed from the stable repo.
poc
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 13:49 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:43 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
Yes, but on x86_64. It installed from the stable repo.
poc
I have evolution-2.30.2-1.fc13.i686 but my kernel is kernel-PAE-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.i686.
Germán.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
It looks like you are not getting updates. ;(
Can you show us the output of:
'yum repolist'
Thanks,
kevin
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
It looks like you are not getting updates. ;(
Can you show us the output of:
'yum repolist'
Thanks,
kevin
----------------------------
Kevin,
Thanks for you help. Here are the results
[root@Re01 ~]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit 3730 packages excluded due to repository priority protections repo id repo name status adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated 18 fedora Fedora 13 - i386 16,814 google-chrome google-chrome 7 rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free 400 rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free - Updates 128+221 rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree 133+1 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree - Updates 21+34 updates Fedora 13 - i386 - Updates 361+3,344 repolist: 17,882
I have been able to install rpm's from this repo, and other rpms seem to be being updated.
Greg
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
It looks like you are not getting updates. ;(
Can you show us the output of:
'yum repolist'
Thanks,
kevin
----------------------------
Kevin,
Thanks for you help. Here are the results
[root@Re01 ~]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit 3730 packages excluded due to repository priority protections repo id repo name status adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated 18 fedora Fedora 13 - i386 16,814 google-chrome google-chrome 7 rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free 400 rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free - Updates 128+221 rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree 133+1 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree - Updates 21+34 updates Fedora 13 - i386 - Updates 361+3,344 repolist: 17,882
I have been able to install rpm's from this repo, and other rpms seem to be being updated.
Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin,
You are correct. I have disabled all repos except fedora and it is obvious that I am not able to get to the new rpm's. I am not sure what to check next. Perhaps the mirrored repo my system is connecting to have not updated their files. Is there a way force a different repository?
Greg
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:41 -0500 "Gregory P. Ennis" PoMec@PoMec.Net wrote:
Dear List,
When I scanned the fedora archives. it appeared that some have been able to update to evolution 2.30.2-1. When I run 'yum -y update' after a 'yum clean all' I am still not seeing 30.2-1 in the repositories for 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE.
Have any of you been able to make this update?
It looks like you are not getting updates. ;(
Can you show us the output of:
'yum repolist'
Thanks,
kevin
----------------------------
Kevin,
Thanks for you help. Here are the results
[root@Re01 ~]# yum repolist Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit 3730 packages excluded due to repository priority protections repo id repo name status adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated 18 fedora Fedora 13 - i386 16,814 google-chrome google-chrome 7 rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free 400 rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Free - Updates 128+221 rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree 133+1 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 13 - Nonfree - Updates 21+34 updates Fedora 13 - i386 - Updates 361+3,344 repolist: 17,882
I have been able to install rpm's from this repo, and other rpms seem to be being updated.
Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin,
You are correct. I have disabled all repos except fedora and it is obvious that I am not able to get to the new rpm's. I am not sure what to check next. Perhaps the mirrored repo my system is connecting to have not updated their files. Is there a way force a different repository?
Greg --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone,
This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start another one on yum.
Thanks Kevin for pointing me in the right direction!!!
Greg
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start another one on yum.
OT, but you might want to check your quoting options. I'm finding this thread increasingly hard to understand as you aren't following the usual conventions in this respect (see the present message for an example). In Evolution, look under Preferences->Composer Preferences->Reply Style. You appear to have it set to Inline (Outlook Style), which is not really suitable for long threads on mailing lists.
poc
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 19:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:17 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
This is not an evolution problem at all. I have several packages that are not updating. I am going to close this thread out and start another one on yum.
OT, but you might want to check your quoting options. I'm finding this thread increasingly hard to understand as you aren't following the usual conventions in this respect (see the present message for an example). In Evolution, look under Preferences->Composer Preferences->Reply Style. You appear to have it set to Inline (Outlook Style), which is not really suitable for long threads on mailing lists.
poc
Sorry.... thanks for the assistance!!