My latest truecrypt patches can be found here:
http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/tah-tc-5.0.tar.gz
This provides a NOGUI=1 build option so you can make a truecrypt that will work without needing an X server (and without needing a gazillion X and gtk libs dragged into memory with it :-).
Also has my 64 bit build patch (much the same as all the others which sprang into existence at about the same time :-).
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Tom Horsley tom.horsley@att.net wrote:
My latest truecrypt patches can be found here:
http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/tah-tc-5.0.tar.gz
This provides a NOGUI=1 build option so you can make a truecrypt that will work without needing an X server (and without needing a gazillion X and gtk libs dragged into memory with it :-).
Also has my 64 bit build patch (much the same as all the others which sprang into existence at about the same time :-).
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Can they defeat a Cold Boot attack ? http://citp.princeton.edu.nyud.net/pub/coldboot.pdf
Is there a solution yet for this?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:44:40 -0500, Javier Perez pepebuho@gmail.com wrote:
Can they defeat a Cold Boot attack ?
I am pretty sure that Truecrypt was specifically mentioned as being vulnerable to this.
http://citp.princeton.edu.nyud.net/pub/coldboot.pdf
Is there a solution yet for this?
That depends on what your threat model is. If you aren't worried about no knock raids or laptops being stolen out of your hands, you can power off the machine and keep it under supervision for a few tens of minutes and at that point recovering keys from the dram will be a lot more tricky.