On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 13:04 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
One of our options includes getting other seeds seeded with our
compose
and dropping the Fedora Project seed. Is this more feasible?
It doesn't really help with the initial compose and the bandwidth cost
of putting the bits /somewhere/ to be made public.
How about not starting to seed it at all, but just do the tracking -and
have others seed it initially, instead? A requirement which can be
awesomely difficult to manage is who gets it first and who's responsible
afterwards :/
It would still have to sit on our torrent server, and chew up disk
space/bandwidth to move it around.
I think we all agree though the tracker should be run by Fedora Project
no matter what, and the official compose should happen on Fedora
Infra... I mean, that's set and a fact, right?
In my mind, with the way things currently are, yes.
The more I think about it, the more I think we should ask Infrastructure
to give us a resource budget, bandwidth/hardware/etc... and we should
design the releases' spins accordingly to fit into that budget. rel-eng
budget it just man power, and I'm sure I could get some volunteers to
make composes happen, so it really comes down to infrastructure to
compose/host it all.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating