Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>> I'm late and not as educated a remixer myself. I'm running a
>>>> livecd-creator process right now to see what happens in the generic-*
>>>> case. Would it make sense to have the Fedora Remix logos appear in
>>>> the generic-logos package by default?
>>>>
>>> In my opinion, we should have a generic package that just debrands.
>> Don't we have already have that with generic-logos? My opinion is that
>> by making available fedora-remix-logos, we can encourage remixes to give
>> Fedora credit which is the whole point of the secondary brand.
>>
>> Rahul
> Yes.. so three logo packages, and you only include one:
>
> fedora-logos
> generic-logos
> fedora-remix-logos
I am saying I agree :)
-- bk