Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> I'm late and not as educated a remixer myself. I'm running a
>> livecd-creator process right now to see what happens in the generic-*
>> case. Would it make sense to have the Fedora Remix logos appear in
>> the generic-logos package by default?
>>
> In my opinion, we should have a generic package that just debrands.
Don't we have already have that with generic-logos? My opinion is that
by making available fedora-remix-logos, we can encourage remixes to give
Fedora credit which is the whole point of the secondary brand.
Yes Rahul..., we have debranding in the form of generic-logos...
So, the actual question was, whether the remix logos should be shipped
in the generic-logos package instead of being in their own
fedora-remix-logos package.
My answer to that question was, that we should have a package that just
debrands, in my opinion no less.
That would at the very least maintain the current situation with a
fedora-logos trademark package, and a generic-logos debrand package.
Hence the remix logos should go into their own package.
How was this unclear exactly?
-Jeroen