Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> The -logos package in the creation of installation media gets chosen by
>> product name, nowadays. You cannot pick a specific -logos package for
>> the installer images build process to use although that was the first
>> patch I attempted to get into anaconda.
>>
>> I can see the added value of having a remix-logos, but it's name is
>> shorter then "fedora-logos" so I'm afraid it might start winning
some
>> yum-best-package selections.
> Is this affecting pungi or livecd-tools as well? I assume I can still
> exclude fedora-logos and include remix-logos in a kickstart file for
> live cds. If it does affect live image creation, what is the recommended
> method to rebrand Fedora now?
>
The change in anaconda behaviour is affecting revisor and pungi, or
actually installation media compose processes in general. That's a
separate issue.
My concern with regards to dependency resolving is that if you do not
explicitly say you want fedora-logos, you end up with remix-logos being
pulled in as the best provider for system-logos. So, this concern really
applies to the situation in which one would not want to rebrand.
Well, ideally people would be inheriting the base ks file and getting it
automatically but if that is a real concern, let's call it
fedora-remix-logos and that name won't be the shortest anymore.
Rahul