On 10/22/2010 05:43 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
I just ran rpmlint against an ruby -doc subpackage and found 196
rubygem-sequel-doc.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro
This tag contains something that looks like an unexpanded macro; this is
the sign of a misspelling. Please check your specfile.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 196 warnings.
About 194 warnings are the same, complaining about yaml files having
¿Can we do better with rpmlint? (posting rpmlint output in bz requests
with this large non-usefull informaction looks just a waste)
ruby-sig mailing list
I've run into this
problem alot myself. Since its fairly standard with
the RI documentation, you can just ignore this part of the rpmlint
output, no need to include it in the BZ issue.
Annoying yes, but rpmlint does need other updates to conform to Fedora
guidelines, for example it still complains about the missing BuildRoot:
Though rpmlint seems to have been updated for F14 (I'm not sure to what
extent though), so perhaps at some point we can either patch it or RI
itself to resolve this issue.