rishi commented on the pull-request: `Toolbx: Fix the 'name' label` that you are
following:
``
I think we need both identifiers, but I think our releng script that
pushes them to registries can actually do that for us.
Having both of these would be definitely good:
*
registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora-toolbox:41
*
registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora-toolbox:rawhide
... because with `rawhide` you don't have to bump the version every six months or so.
However, if we really are publishing or want to publish one tag, then it would be good if
we kept the number for the sake of backwards compatibility, both for Toolbx and what
manual users had gotten used to.
For Toolbx, I always wanted to do a quick query and map `rawhide` to a number. Or we can
use `rawhide` directly if there's an image with that tag. Then the corresponding
`fedora-toolbox-rawhide` container would remain Rawhide after Branching, which would avoid
a lot of confusion.
Whatever we do, the existing `toolbox(1)` code really expects the tag on the registry to
be a number. Having only a `rawhide` tag will require code changes.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/1246