#2244: How to mass branch s390utils and other non-primary arch packages
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: toshio | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
This is a rel-eng decision that I'll need input on. Currently the
packagedb branches packages which are not blocked in koji. Some packages
which are not built for the primary arch are blocked in koji -- s390utils
for instance. Does the packagedb need to whitelist these or should the
packages be unblocked as they are discovered?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2244>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4605: bodhi crashes with 500 internal server error when i try to remove a build
from a ticket
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: lennart | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Wanted to edit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-
policy-3.9.16-9.fc15,systemd-22-1.fc15
and replace selinux-policy-3.9.16-9.fc15 by selinux-policy-3.9.16-10.fc15,
and i couldn't, because bodhi crashed. Regardless whether I tried to
replace -9 with -10, or just tried to remove -9.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4605>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4149: Need a way to point EC2 instances to specific mirrors
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: gholms | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
To get Fedora working well on Amazon's EC2 cloud computing service ![1]
the Cloud SIG is working on creating yum mirrors inside Amazon's network.
Doing so provides a number of benefits:
* Faster updates for users
* People with hundreds of Fedora instances don't overload other public
mirrors
* No data transfer costs for users or those who fund the EC2 mirrors
(traffic within a given cloud region is free)
Unfortunately, data transfers are only free if they stay within a given
region. This, combined with the fact that EC2's IP addresses freely roam
between regions, makes normal IP-based direction via !MirrorManager
impossible. We therefore need another way of directing clients toward the
mirrors that reside within their own regions.
Our list of proposed solutions to this are posted in the "Client Access"
portion of my overall proposal for EC2 mirror infrastructure ![2]. Could
you folks (a) offer any feedback, or (b) choose which solution would be
best? I apologize if this is more of a FESCo question; I can take it to
them if that would be better.
![1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/EC2
![2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Gholms/EC2_Mirror_Proposal#Client_Access
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4149>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4057: Update gitolite build
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: cvs
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Need to do a new gitolite build from upstream and get it into el6 and test
it on pkgs.stg then move it to pkgs. This should allow us to remove some
of our custom hacks.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4057>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#3802: Symlink for latest branched and rawhide mash
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: mash
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
== Problem Space ==
Currently, the [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages
Critical Path Packages] wiki page links to most recently branched and
rawhide critpath.txt files. However, depending on the status of the
compose/mash/pungi, or the timing of the branched schedule, these log
files may not be available. In order to eliminate confusion and 404 links
from the wiki, it would be helpful to provide a link to an ''always''
available critpath.log URL.
== Proposal ==
Create a symlink for the latest successful branched and rawhide
pungi/mash/compose. This symlink will be referenced when directing users
to the latest definition of the critical path. For example:
* http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-latest ->
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20100618/
* http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched-latest ->
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched-20100518/
The symlink would be updated upon successful mashing of rawhide or
branched.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3802>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: hadess | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
It's too complicated, human-dependent, and time-consuming to build
interdependent package updates in stable releases.
Two cases:
* gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base are released at the same time, and
so are pre-releases of those. They soft-depend on each other (gstreamer
can be updated on its own). It's currently not possible for me to offer
both pre-releases of gstreamer and gsteamer-plugins-base without either:
1. asking for a package to be tagged into the build roots
2. pushing gstreamer into stable (takes a few days at best), and push the
gstreamer-plugins-base package separately
* gnome-bluetooth and gnome-phone-manager, where I need to ask for gnome-
bluetooth to be pushed into the buildroot tree. Sometimes that just
doesn't work (as could have been seen in
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7140 /
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1945 and
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112091 )
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2025>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4682: need empty updates-debuginfo repos created too
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mdomsch | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
At the branchpoint, the rel-eng SOP includes creating empty
updates/{newversion}/{arch}/ repositories, and creating empty
updates/testing/{newversion}/{arch}/ repositories. However, corresponding
debuginfo repositories in updates/ are not created, while they are in
updates/testing/.
updates/testing/15/SRPMS/repodata
updates/testing/15/i386/debug/repodata
updates/testing/15/i386/repodata
updates/testing/15/x86_64/debug/repodata
updates/testing/15/x86_64/repodata
updates/15/i386/repodata
updates/15/SRPMS/repodata
updates/15/x86_64/repodata
MirrorManager returns an (empty) metalink document for non-existant
requested repositories. Yum requests these debuginfo repositories as well,
and doesn't like it when it gets back this (empty) metalink document. See
bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679783
Please adjust the SOP to ensure that empty
updates/{newversion}/{arch}/debug/ repositories are created at the same
time updates/{newversion}/{arch} repositories are created.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4682>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
#4772: Update after 3 days in testing cannot be pushed to stable
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: vondruch | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Hello, today I have received email from Bodhi:
bodhi - 2011-06-10 05:03:57 (karma: 0)
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now
if the maintainer wishes
However it can't be pushed according to bodhi:
This update has not yet met the minimum testing requirements defined in
the Package Update Acceptance Criteria
I believe it was always 7 days for stable release. Could you please fix
this discrepancy?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4772>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project