#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees
by Fedora Release Engineering
#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: notting | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Rawhide tree expiry is manual at the moment, unless I missed something.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1107>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
8 years, 7 months
#3624: fullfilelist changes
by Fedora Release Engineering
#3624: fullfilelist changes
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
After each push, we need to run the following command:
rsync -r . > fullfilelist
This should overwrite the fullfilelist that's there and isn't very useful
at the moment:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/fullfilelist
We can't do this via a cron job, it has to go out after each push so it
needs to be added to those scripts.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3624>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 10 months
#3761: add gpg signature for .treeinfo file and/or add CHECKSUM file for unsigned content of images
by Fedora Release Engineering
#3761: add gpg signature for .treeinfo file and/or add CHECKSUM file for unsigned
content of images
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: other
Keywords: meeting |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Description of problem:
Currently the only way to verify the contents of .treeinfo or the
installer
images is to download the .iso and the regarding -CHECKSUM file and check
it.
But e.g. preupgrade does not download the .iso but the *.img files, the
kernel
and the .treeinfo directly from a mirror. Therefore it is also not
possible to
easily verify these files. I guess the preupgrade way of updating is
somehow
popular, therefore it should be possible to do this securely.
I filed a bug against preupgrade for not verifying anything and not
announcing
this here: bug 509338
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3761>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
9 years, 11 months
#3759: bad distro tags in Fedora 13/x86_64
by Fedora Release Engineering
#3759: bad distro tags in Fedora 13/x86_64
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: james | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------+--------------------------------------------------------
From yum repolist -v fedora ...
Repo-id : fedora
Repo-name : Fedora 13 - x86_64
Repo-revision: 1274245576
Repo-tags : binary-x86_64
Repo-distro-tags: [cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:13]: rawhide
...this isn't rawhide though.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3759>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
10 years, 4 months
#2244: How to mass branch s390utils and other non-primary arch packages
by Fedora Release Engineering
#2244: How to mass branch s390utils and other non-primary arch packages
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: toshio | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
This is a rel-eng decision that I'll need input on. Currently the
packagedb branches packages which are not blocked in koji. Some packages
which are not built for the primary arch are blocked in koji -- s390utils
for instance. Does the packagedb need to whitelist these or should the
packages be unblocked as they are discovered?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2244>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
10 years, 4 months
#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable
by Fedora Release Engineering
#2025: Too hard to build dependent packages in stable
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: hadess | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
It's too complicated, human-dependent, and time-consuming to build
interdependent package updates in stable releases.
Two cases:
* gstreamer and gstreamer-plugins-base are released at the same time, and
so are pre-releases of those. They soft-depend on each other (gstreamer
can be updated on its own). It's currently not possible for me to offer
both pre-releases of gstreamer and gsteamer-plugins-base without either:
1. asking for a package to be tagged into the build roots
2. pushing gstreamer into stable (takes a few days at best), and push the
gstreamer-plugins-base package separately
* gnome-bluetooth and gnome-phone-manager, where I need to ask for gnome-
bluetooth to be pushed into the buildroot tree. Sometimes that just
doesn't work (as could have been seen in
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7140 /
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1945 and
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112091 )
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2025>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
11 years, 1 month
#3740: fix critpath generation to be per branch and properly import into pkgdb
by Fedora Release Engineering
#3740: fix critpath generation to be per branch and properly import into pkgdb
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: notting | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
As I understand it, critical path generation should work like this:
{{{
* Lists are generated at rawhide, branched, or updates compose time
* These lists are synced into pkgdb for that branch
* bodhi then reads these from pkgdb
}}}
Where are we currently? For the first item, we only generate critpath
during rawhide/branched compose.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3740>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
11 years, 10 months
[Fedora Release Engineering] #859: updates-newkey doesn't have group_gz member
by Fedora Release Engineering
#859: updates-newkey doesn't have group_gz member
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: james(a)fedoraproject.org | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: koji
Keywords: |
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I assume the createrepo instance that generates the Fedora 9 updates-
newkey/updates-testing-newkey is the RHEL-5 version?
Can we change this to be the Fedora 9 version so that we'll get group_gz
as well as group (ie. comps.xml.gz as well as comps.xml). This makes for
much less data to download, to get group information.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/859>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
11 years, 10 months
#3565: Please Tag libproxy-0.3.1-4.fc13 for F-13 Beta - default install of libproxy modules
by Fedora Release Engineering
#3565: Please Tag libproxy-0.3.1-4.fc13 for F-13 Beta - default install of
libproxy modules
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: kwizart | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: Fedora 13 Beta | Component: koji
Keywords: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Hello,
I request libproxy-0.3.1-4.fc13 to be tagged as F-13 Beta.
This is the last update before the ABI change of the 0.4.0 version that
has already appeared in F-14.
Here is the Changelog between 0.2.3 and 0.3.1:
http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/source/browse/trunk/ChangeLog
On a side note, installing libproxy on a default desktop install of F-13
Alpha will, lead to have:
libproxy
libproxy-bin
libproxy-python
With this package, the default will lead to have:
libproxy
And that will be all, as all unneeded dependencies have been dropped as
described in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537569
Once that said, it would be more valuable to have libproxy-gnome installed
as soon as the gnome desktop is selected on install. (1)
Upstream advice is to use Rpm's 'Suggests' instead of 'Requires', as
requires would imply some circle dependencies.
But we don't use Suggests much if possible. So I think it would be better
handled by comps for now.
(1)
Same for:
libproxy-kde and KDE desktop
libproxy-mozjs and firefox
libproxy-webkit and WebKit-gtk
libproxy-networkmanager and NetworkManager
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3565>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
12 years, 7 months