On 08/07/2014 06:10 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan(a)redhat.com>
> On 07/30/2014 12:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide has
>> just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there
>> right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and
>> everything will be fine.
>>
>> Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our
>> rawhide Python?
>
> Patching rawhide would be wonderful. The patch is at last passing
> Python's own test suite, so it shouldn't have broken anything too
> dramatically.
I am willing to work on this starting next week (atm I am at flock),
I will test it along with some ssl dependent packages.
Did anyone get a chance to try this out?
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services
Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane
HSS Provisioning Architect