----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 7:57:21 AM
Subject: Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing
On 08/07/2014 06:10 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan(a)redhat.com>
>> On 07/30/2014 12:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>> So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide
>>> just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there
>>> right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and
>>> everything will be fine.
>>> Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our
>>> rawhide Python?
>> Patching rawhide would be wonderful. The patch is at last passing
>> Python's own test suite, so it shouldn't have broken anything too
> I am willing to work on this starting next week (atm I am at flock),
> I will test it along with some ssl dependent packages.
Did anyone get a chance to try this out?
sorry for the delay.
I did apply the patch, I have encountered seg fault in unicodeobject.c.
Right now I am checking for diffs in upstream 2.7 branch between our
unicodeobject.c and theirs.
After that I will update the upstream bug report.
Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services
Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane
HSS Provisioning Architect
python-devel mailing list
#fedora-devel on freenode
#brno #gulag #software-collections on brq.redhat