Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com 2010-01-15 08:52:25 EST --- (In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #1)
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM.
perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis perl-IO-stringy.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-IO-stringy-2.110/examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis /usr/bin/perl
...
- Fix rpmlint message by adding following to %prep
chmod 644 examples/IO_Scalar_synopsis
The rpmlint warnings don't really need fixing; having the example executable makes it easier to try, and the /usr/bin/perl dependency isn't adding anything that isn't already required by the package.
Just thought lets keep rpmlint silent. And yes I agree keeping it executable is easier to try.
Thanks for committing the changes. But Just wonder do you see macros in SPEC are more recommended for perl packages?
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org