Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Inconsistent @INC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448735
------- Additional Comments From skasal@redhat.com 2008-05-29 07:57 EST ------- Well, if I remove the empty directory /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7, then it disappears from @INC. I guess we should not deliberately break old third party modules, so we might keep that as a candidate for the @INC, but should not pack the empty dirs to the rpm.
The report also shows another inconsistency: on i386, site_perl is under /usr/lib*, while on x86_64 it is under /usr/local/lib*. Which is right?
Since our rpm's should install to vendor_perl, not site_perl, it would seem that /usr/local/lib* is the right place for site_perl. But we have to do something about backward compatibility... Would a symlink suffice?
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org