Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Misnamed package, add Provides?
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2005-08-16 03:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
I thought that the package naming guidelines would have adviced to
perl-$CPANDIST, but instead it goes on to say things about "the CPAN module
Can we agree upon this and make this mandatory for FE?
Is there consenus on this?
IMO, that makes no sense because the unit of CPAN module packaging is
_distribution_, and the vast majority those distributions contain more than
one module. What's "the CPAN module name" then? Just using the CPAN
distribution name would work, and is already used in all CPAN packages I'm
I would not bet on FC, but I guess, you are right as far as FE is
How to proceed with this package?
1. Apply cvs tricks (I.e. an admin moving the files in CVS)?
2. Re-import the package into CVS under "perl-gettext" and "cvs rm"
3. Let it be in FC-4 and re-import it as "perl-gettext" into "devel"?
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.