Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285
Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-14 06:56:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
As mentioned in comment #10, I'm convinced the non-standard version tag should
stay in this case.
- source matches upstream FAIL -> source at upstream is in tar.gz
format
Fixed in release 34.
- no unnecessary BR FAIL
[...]
Please fix the source and useless dependency.
??? BuildRequires: perl-libxml-perl perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
I see no problem here.
(In reply to comment #10)
perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(XML::Grove)
This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it
once.
No explicit provides.
Both "perl(XML::Grove)" and "perl(XML::Grove) = 0.46" are generated.
It might be a bug in rpmlint or the dependency generator, but not in this
package.
perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl
perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX)
An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in
the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example
scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation.
(the latter is repeated twice)
Again, these are bogus. The *.pl files in doc do not have their executable bit
set, and the require "perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX)" is justified by other *.pm
files in the package.
To sum up, the review passed.
Several issues about rpmlint and/or the dependency generator are due to be
filed.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.