Le Jeu 23 août 2007 15:34, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 23 août 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the
guidelines
are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is
impossible.
I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time do they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be
Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of all the examples:
"In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing after a package uninstall."
Who can add this ?