[Bug 2222854] New: perl-Test-Valgrind-1.19-22.fc39 FTBFS with perl
5.38.0: t/20-bad.t fails
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222854
Bug ID: 2222854
Summary: perl-Test-Valgrind-1.19-22.fc39 FTBFS with perl
5.38.0: t/20-bad.t fails
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Test-Va
lgrind
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Valgrind
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2168842 (F39FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Test-Valgrind-1.19-22.fc39 fails to build because a test fails with perl
5.38.0:
t/00-load.t ................... ok
# Using valgrind 3.21.0 located at /usr/bin/valgrind
# Generating suppressions...
# Suppressions for this perl stored in
/builddir/.perl/Test-Valgrind/suppressions/1.19/memcheck-3.21.0-89544340d2cf0ab61f972f6ffa315e7d.supp
# Using suppressions from
/builddir/.perl/Test-Valgrind/suppressions/1.19/memcheck-3.21.0-89544340d2cf0ab61f972f6ffa315e7d.supp
# 1..1
# not ok 1 - dummy test in the child, should not interfere with the actual TAP
stream
#
# # Failed test 'dummy test in the child, should not interfere with the
actual TAP stream'
# # at t/10-good.t line 30.
# # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
t/10-good.t ................... ok
# Using valgrind 3.21.0 located at /usr/bin/valgrind
# Using suppressions from
/builddir/.perl/Test-Valgrind/suppressions/1.19/memcheck-3.21.0-89544340d2cf0ab61f972f6ffa315e7d.supp
# dummy run-time exception, should not cause the test to fail at
t/12-good-run-exception.t line 20.
t/12-good-run-exception.t ..... ok
# Using valgrind 3.21.0 located at /usr/bin/valgrind
# Using suppressions from
/builddir/.perl/Test-Valgrind/suppressions/1.19/memcheck-3.21.0-89544340d2cf0ab61f972f6ffa315e7d.supp
# # leaking some bytes!
# 10,000 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 18 of 18
# malloc (/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
[vg_replace_malloc.c:431]
# tv_leak
(/builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/arch/auto/Test/Valgrind/Valgrind.so)
[Valgrind.xs:34]
# XS_Test__Valgrind_leak
(/builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/arch/auto/Test/Valgrind/Valgrind.so)
[Valgrind.xs:54]
# ? (/usr/lib/libperl.so.5.38.0) [?:?]
# Perl_runops_standard (/usr/lib/libperl.so.5.38.0) [?:?]
# perl_run (/usr/lib/libperl.so.5.38.0) [?:?]
# ? (/usr/bin/perl) [?:?]
# (below main) (/usr/lib/libc.so.6) [?:?]
# Failed test 'Leak_StillReachable'
# at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/lib/Test/Valgrind/Session.pm line
598.
# got: 1
# expected: 0
# Failed test 'caught one extra leak'
# at /builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/lib/Test/Valgrind.pm line
307.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
# Failed test 'no extra leak caught, hence no bytes leaked'
# at /builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/lib/Test/Valgrind.pm line
307.
# Failed test 'no extra leak caught, hence no block leaked'
# at /builddir/build/BUILD/Test-Valgrind-1.19/blib/lib/Test/Valgrind.pm line
307.
# Looks like your test exited with 1 just after 18.
t/20-bad.t ....................
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 4/18 subtests
# Using IO::Handle 1.52
# Using IO::Select 1.52
# Using IPC::Open3 1.22
t/30-skip.t ................... ok
t/60-version.t ................ ok
t/70-session.t ................ ok
t/71-session-command.t ........ ok
# The default suppression file contains 12 suppressions, of which 12 are not
empty and 12 apply to perl
t/80-suppressions.t ........... ok
t/81-suppressions-demangle.t .. ok
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/20-bad.t (Wstat: 256 (exited 1) Tests: 18 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 15-18
Non-zero exit status: 1
Files=10, Tests=200, 39 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.02 sys + 37.38 cusr 1.17
csys = 38.66 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/10 test programs. 4/200 subtests failed.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168842
[Bug 2168842] Fedora 39 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2222854
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
10 months