[Bug 1899120] New: perl-Net-DNS-1.29 is available
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899120
Bug ID: 1899120
Summary: perl-Net-DNS-1.29 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-DNS
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: pwouters(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com, kasal(a)ucw.cz,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
pwouters(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com,
rstrode(a)redhat.com, sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.29
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.28-1.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-DNS/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3147/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1890417] New: amavisd-new-snmp can't be installed on EL8
because of dropped net-snmp-perl
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890417
Bug ID: 1890417
Summary: amavisd-new-snmp can't be installed on EL8 because of
dropped net-snmp-perl
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: amavisd-new
Assignee: j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com
Reporter: pb(a)bieringer.de
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org,
vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
amavisd-new-snmp can't be installed on EL8 because of dependency
"net-snmp-perl" was dropped from EL8 and also not available on EPEL8
Version:
2.12.0-9
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
yum install amavisd-new-snmp
Last metadata expiration check: 0:15:58 ago on Thu Oct 22 08:35:19 2020.
Actual results:
Error:
Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
- nothing provides perl(NetSNMP::ASN) needed by
amavis-snmp-2.12.0-9.el8.noarch
- nothing provides perl(NetSNMP::OID) needed by
amavis-snmp-2.12.0-9.el8.noarch
- nothing provides perl(NetSNMP::agent) needed by
amavis-snmp-2.12.0-9.el8.noarch
- nothing provides perl(NetSNMP::default_store) needed by
amavis-snmp-2.12.0-9.el8.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use
not only best candidate packages)
Expected results:
working
Additional info:
There is "net-snmp-perl" available on Okay-repo, but this downgrades also
net-snmp-libs (and others).
Imho it was a very strange decission to drop the "net-snmp-perl", because
potentially this cannot even put dedicated into EPEL8...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1851872] New: Wrong tag in comment line of DKIM record: 'i='
should be 's='
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872
Bug ID: 1851872
Summary: Wrong tag in comment line of DKIM record: 'i=' should
be 's='
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: amavisd-new
Severity: low
Assignee: jortialc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aad(a)offerman.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: janfrode(a)tanso.net, jortialc(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, steve(a)silug.org,
vanmeeuwen+fedora(a)kolabsys.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The comment line generated with the DKIM record shows an 'i=' (identifier) tag,
while this should be the 's=' (selector) tag.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.12.0
How reproducible:
set up a DKIM key pair in the configuration and run the command:
amavisd -c /etc/amavisd/amavisd.conf showkeys
the first line of a/each DKIM record is a command line, now saying something
like this:
; key#27 4096 bits, i=dkim20191228, d=example.com,
/etc/amavisd/example.com.dkim20191228.pem
this should be:
; key#27 4096 bits, s=dkim20191228, d=example.com,
/etc/amavisd/example.com.dkim20191228.pem
Additional info:
Since this is only a comment line providing info on the actual record that
follows, there's no harm done, other than suggesting that this is the
identifier rather than the selector tag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1902699] New: Upgrade perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser to 0.25
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902699
Bug ID: 1902699
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser to 0.25
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 0.24 version. Upstream released 0.25. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1902697] New: Upgrade perl-CBOR-XS to 1.8
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902697
Bug ID: 1902697
Summary: Upgrade perl-CBOR-XS to 1.8
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CBOR-XS
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: denis(a)fateyev.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 1.71 version. Upstream released 1.8. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 1186698] /etc/profile.d/perl-homedir.csh contains bourne shell
"if" code. Makes tcsh prompt "if: Expression Syntax."
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186698
Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed| |2020-11-30 15:55:30
--- Comment #7 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
EPEL el6 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2020-11-30. EPEL el6 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
EPEL please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months
[Bug 663069] Wrong charset in graph.
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663069
Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed| |2020-11-30 15:54:17
--- Comment #14 from Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> ---
EPEL el6 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2020-11-30. EPEL el6 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
EPEL please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 6 months