[Bug 1336403] New: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct stringification of
Mail::Internet; same as reference object'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336403
Bug ID: 1336403
Summary: perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 FTBS:
t/abstractions.t test fails: Failed test 'correct
stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Abstract
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Abstract-3.008-4.fc25 fails to build in F25 because tests fail:
/00-report-prereqs.t .. ok
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# testing Email::Simple with 2.210
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Mail::Internet with 2.17
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# Failed test 'correct stringification of Mail::Internet; same as reference
object'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 74.
# got: ''
# expected: 'Joanna, All
#
# Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman.
#
# On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote:
# > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague
# > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS
# > changes of the following form were necessary:
# > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was
such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really??
#
# -----
# Andrew Josey The Open Group
# Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road,
# Email: a.josey(a)opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England
# Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110'
# Failed test 'correct body length for Mail::Internet'
# at t/lib/Test/EmailAbstract.pm line 80.
# got: '0'
# expected: '749'
# testing Mail::Message with 2.118
# testing MIME::Entity with 5.507
# testing Email::MIME with 1.937
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 165.
t/abstractions.t .......
Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/165 subtests
This is caused by upgrading perl-MailTools from 2.16-1.fc25 to 2.17-1.fc25.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 5Â months
[Bug 1475786] New: Useless dependency on Test::MinimumVersion
by bugzillaï¼ redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475786
Bug ID: 1475786
Summary: Useless dependency on Test::MinimumVersion
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Email-Simple
Assignee: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tcallawa(a)redhat.com
perl-Email-Simple build-requires Test::MinimumVersion, but the module is not
used at all in the code. I recommend removing the build-requirement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 1397732] New: CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite:
XML exponential entity expansion denial-of-service [epel-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397732
Bug ID: 1397732
Summary: CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service [epel-all]
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: perl-SOAP-Lite
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com
Reporter: anemec(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
janfrode(a)tanso.net, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1397731 (CVE-2015-8978)
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of Fedora EPEL.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s). This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.
Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.
NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora EPEL. While
only one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions
at the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
other, you may clone this bug as appropriate.
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397731
[Bug 1397731] CVE-2015-8978 perl-SOAP-Lite: XML exponential entity
expansion denial-of-service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 6Â months
[Bug 1462514] New: Requires for bugzilla package missing
perl(ExtUtils::
MakeMaker)
by bugzillaï¼ redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1462514
Bug ID: 1462514
Summary: Requires for bugzilla package missing
perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
Product: Fedora
Version: 26
Component: bugzilla
Assignee: itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br
Reporter: quentin(a)armitage.org.uk
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bazanluis20(a)gmail.com, emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
`dnf install bugzilla` produces the following output:
Can't locate ExtUtils/MM.pm in @INC (you may need to install the ExtUtils::MM
module) (@INC contains: . lib /usr/local/lib64/perl5 /usr/local/share/perl5
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5
/usr/share/perl5) at Bugzilla/Install/Util.pm line 49.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bugzilla-5.0.3-5.fc26.noarch
How reproducible:
Install without perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker installed
Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf install bugzilla
2.
3.
Actual results:
Error message shown above
Expected results:
No error message
Additional info:
Installing perl-Exttils-MakeMaker before installing bugzilla stops the error
message being produced.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 7Â months
[Bug 1393834] New: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 FTBFS on
ppc64le:
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393834
Bug ID: 1393834
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 FTBFS on ppc64le:
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 1051573 (F-ExcludeArch-ppc64le,PPC64LETracker)
External Bug ID: CPAN 118695
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-17.fc26 fails to build on ppc64le:
t/01basic.t ...... ok
Can't call method "element" on an undefined value at
/builddir/build/BUILD/Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05/blib/lib/Algorithm/CurveFit.pm
line 217.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 before it could output anything.
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 13/13 subtests
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051573
[Bug 1051573] ppc64le tracker bug
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 8Â months
[Bug 1242769] New: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769
Bug ID: 1242769
Summary: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed
test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Algorithm-CurveFit
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail:
t/01basic.t ...... ok
# Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/13 subtests
Verbose test output:
$ prove -b -v t/02bad_deriv.t
t/02bad_deriv.t ..
1..13
ok 1
ok 2
not ok 3
# Failed test at t/02bad_deriv.t line 50.
ok 4
ok 5
ok 6
ok 7
ok 8
ok 9
ok 10
ok 11
ok 12
ok 13
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 13.
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/13 subtests
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6Â years, 8Â months