On 26.11.22 16:54, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 11/25/22 11:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi! The following is all nitpicking. I hope it won't cause a
> bikeshedding discussion, I'm not going to fight for any of this, I just
> want to get it of my chest.
Sorry, I do have somewhat of a bikeshed suggestion:
:-D
> On 25.11.22 11:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>>> kernel-modules-{extra,internal} - no changes
> I always found "internal" confusing, because it makes my head go
> "internal to what? The Kernel?". Hence while we're reshuffling this,
why
> not make it more obvious what this package contains and call it
> something like "kernel-modules-testing" or something like that?
I agree that internal is confusing. But testing reminds me of
updates-testing, so I find -testing this somewhat confusing too.
Usually packaged test programs are called just tests, so maybe we can
go with: "kernel-modules-tests" or "kernel-modules-selftests" ?
Yeah, both are better than my suggestion.
Ciao, Thorsten