Hi,
On 11/25/22 11:40, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Hi! The following is all nitpicking. I hope it won't cause a
bikeshedding discussion, I'm not going to fight for any of this, I just
want to get it of my chest.
Sorry, I do have somewhat of a bikeshed suggestion:
On 25.11.22 11:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> So how about splitting 'kernel-core' into a modules and a kernel
binary
>>> package? Like this:
>>>
>>> kernel-modules-core - the modules from current 'kernel-core'
>>> kernel-modules-standard - current 'kernel-modules' renamed (maybe
>>> skip rename, but I think it'll be less
>>> confusing that way).
>>> kernel-modules-{extra,internal} - no changes
I always found "internal" confusing, because it makes my head go
"internal to what? The Kernel?". Hence while we're reshuffling this, why
not make it more obvious what this package contains and call it
something like "kernel-modules-testing" or something like that?
I agree that internal is confusing. But testing reminds me of
updates-testing, so I find -testing this somewhat confusing too.
Usually packaged test programs are called just tests, so maybe we can
go with: "kernel-modules-tests" or "kernel-modules-selftests" ?
Regards,
Hans