Doctor List
by Campos fogy
Certified Doctors in the US
788,173 in total <> 17,686 emails
Featuring the most complete contact information in many different areas of medicine
16 different sortable fields
Reduced to only: $399
======= ITEMS BELOW ARE INCLUDED IN THE DEAL AT NO EXTRA COST =======
** Listing of American Pharma Companies
47,000 personal emails and names of decision makers
** American Hospitals
Full data for all the major positions in more than 7k facilities
** Extensive Database of Dentists in America
A complete List or dentists and related services (valued at $399)
** US Chiropractor List
100,000 Chiropractors in the USA (worth $250 alone)
email to: Hanks(a)masterlistdoc.com
good until November 28
Send email to out(a)masterlistdoc.com to ensure no further communication
14 years, 10 months
why su -c 'yum install rpmdevtools' Processing Dependency failed ?
by xkdcc
I want to build my kernel on Fedora.
But when I install rpmdevtolls in advanced, I met problems:
# uname -a
# Linux fdvm.brantdomain 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 #1 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux
# yum install rpmdevtools
......
Error: --> Processing Dependency: elfutils-libelf = 0.123-1.fc6 package: elfutils-libelf-devel
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: elfutils-libelf conflicts with elfutils > 0.123-1.fc6
Error: elfutils-libelf conflicts with elfutils-libs > 0.123-1.fc6
Error: Missing Dependency: elfutils-libelf = 0.123-1.fc6 is needed by package elfutils-libelf-devel
Please help me out. Thanks.
14 years, 10 months
7238 pro Monat ist erreichbar
by Mirabelle vollmar
Anlieferer gesucht!!!
Auch fuer Fruehrentner geeignet! Ein Fahrzeug kann gestellt werden.
Bewerbung bitte an ulfmute(a)mail.kz
14 years, 10 months
Lustre and Fedora 9
by Ted Sume Nzuonkwelle
Hi,
Has anyone attempted to patch a fedora 9 kernel with support for the
Lustre filesystem?? If so i would like to know what your experiences
were.......
Thks
- Ted Sume
University of Colorado
14 years, 10 months
Boot issues on fedora 9
by Luca Foppiano
Hi,
I found this list few days ago and I tried bootchart on my laptop. I
have a dell D630 with Fedora 9 (updated from fedora 8 with anaconda).
My actual kernel is the last 64 bit (2.6.27), updated yesterday:
[lfoppiano@sboing ~]$ uname -a
Linux sboing.byte-code.lan 2.6.27.5-37.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12
18:31:37 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I tried bootchart and I got a lot of strange things:
- nash is slow (it takes about 20 second to inizialize itself)
- there are a lot of "grep" and bash launched after udevd
I don't have idea why my chart is as is, but, using kernel verbosity
(removing quiet) on the kernel option, I noted it needed more than 10
second to load the SATA driver.
I attached to you bootchart chart and kernel log from /var/log/messages
I don't know if the problem is the kernel configuration/build or
something else (maybe my configuration should be cleaned) but I'm try to
fix it without reinstall fedora. ;-)
Thanks
Luca
14 years, 10 months
Re: Kernel failure
by Kyle McMartin
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:50:39PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is everyone getting a "Kernel failure" message
> with the latest kernel, 2.6.27.4-79.fc10.i686 ?
> I haven't noticed any adverse effect from it.
> (I did send the back-trace as requested.)
>
> I notice that following the backtrace in /var/log/messages
> it says
>
> Nov 8 14:22:21 carrie kernel:
> kobject_add_internal failed for 1 with -EEXIST,
> don't try to register things with the same name in the same directory.
>
> But I have no idea what this means.
>
It would be helpful if you could attach a bit more of the context around
this. There should be a bit of spew with it that would help us debug it.
regards, Kyle
14 years, 10 months
Review? last-minute f10 change for ext4
by Eric Sandeen
AFAICS, these 2 changes only affect ext4. But since it's
in mm/page-writeback.c, I'd sure like another set of eyes
to be sure I'm not dragged into the streets for breaking
F10 at the last minute in an effort to get one final ext4
update into the release... Out of an abundance of caution...
anyone care to give me a little cover? :)
Thanks,
-Eric
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:21:02 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: vfs: Remove the range_cont writeback mode.
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.28-rc1~257^2~8
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;...
vfs: Remove the range_cont writeback mode.
Ext4 was the only user of range_cont writeback mode and ext4 switched
to a different method. So remove the range_cont mode which is not used
in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso(a)mit.edu>
CC: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org
---
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:09:17 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.28-rc1~257^2~7
X-Git-Url: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux-2.6.git;...
vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag
If no_nrwrite_index_update is set we don't update nr_to_write and
address space writeback_index in write_cache_pages. This change
enables a file system to skip these updates in write_cache_pages and do
them in the writepages() callback. This patch will be followed by an
ext4 patch that make use of these new flags.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso(a)mit.edu>
CC: linux-fsdevel(a)vger.kernel.org
---
Index: linux-2.6.27.noarch/include/linux/writeback.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.noarch.orig/include/linux/writeback.h 2008-10-09 17:13:53.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.27.noarch/include/linux/writeback.h 2008-11-07 15:16:16.420063484 -0600
@@ -63,7 +63,15 @@ struct writeback_control {
unsigned for_writepages:1; /* This is a writepages() call */
unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
- unsigned range_cont:1;
+ /*
+ * write_cache_pages() won't update wbc->nr_to_write and
+ * mapping->writeback_index if no_nrwrite_index_update
+ * is set. write_cache_pages() may write more than we
+ * requested and we want to make sure nr_to_write and
+ * writeback_index are updated in a consistent manner
+ * so we use a single control to update them
+ */
+ unsigned no_nrwrite_index_update:1;
};
/*
Index: linux-2.6.27.noarch/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.27.noarch.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2008-10-09 17:13:53.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.27.noarch/mm/page-writeback.c 2008-11-07 15:16:16.422063553 -0600
@@ -876,6 +876,7 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_spa
pgoff_t end; /* Inclusive */
int scanned = 0;
int range_whole = 0;
+ long nr_to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
@@ -939,7 +940,7 @@ retry:
unlock_page(page);
ret = 0;
}
- if (ret || (--(wbc->nr_to_write) <= 0))
+ if (ret || (--nr_to_write <= 0))
done = 1;
if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
wbc->encountered_congestion = 1;
@@ -958,11 +959,12 @@ retry:
index = 0;
goto retry;
}
- if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
- mapping->writeback_index = index;
+ if (!wbc->no_nrwrite_index_update) {
+ if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && nr_to_write > 0))
+ mapping->writeback_index = index;
+ wbc->nr_to_write = nr_to_write;
+ }
- if (wbc->range_cont)
- wbc->range_start = index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_cache_pages);
14 years, 11 months