Thank you for the relevant information, much appreciated.
2015-06-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl>:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> I will try to comment on package reviews of other packages
> few days, to get a feeling for the review process.
might be useful if you're
for review tickets. You'd want the "new tickets"
subcategory... and start
at the bottom, with the newest ones, and ignore green ones.
I now have done a review comment, carrying out most of the items from the
review guidelines on the orocos-bfl library:
If you want to concentrate on scientific packages, you might want to
yourself to CC list on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-SCITECH
and also look at current list of dependent tickets.
Very interesting, I have but myself in cc and will use this as a starting
point for doing more review comments in the next days.
You mentioned rpmlint, but not fedora-review. I strongly suggest it, since
it does more interesting checks.
I used fedora-review for the review comment on orocos-bfl, thank you for
pointing it out. It is extremely effective in generating most of the files
I wanted to look at and a nice overview and list of points to start out