Thank you for the relevant information, much appreciated.
2015-06-18 19:55 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Soeren Moeller wrote:
> > I will try to comment on package reviews of other packages during the next
> > few days, to get a feeling for the review process.
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus might be useful if you're looking
> for review tickets. You'd want the "new tickets" subcategory... and start
> at the bottom, with the newest ones, and ignore green ones.
I now have done a review comment, carrying out most of the items from the review guidelines on the orocos-bfl library:
> If you want to concentrate on scientific packages, you might want to add
> yourself to CC list on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=FE-SCITECH,
> and also look at current list of dependent tickets.
Very interesting, I have but myself in cc and will use this as a starting point for doing more review comments in the next days.
> You mentioned rpmlint, but not fedora-review. I strongly suggest it, since
> it does more interesting checks.
I used fedora-review for the review comment on orocos-bfl, thank you for pointing it out. It is extremely effective in generating most of the files I wanted to look at and a nice overview and list of points to start out with.