On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in
>> f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by
>> some other gnome packages.
>
> I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates separately.
>
> Can you wait with this until we are out of the alpha freeze and gnome
> 3.20.0 builds have gone stable? Like, until early next week or so? This
> should give it a bit time to shake out any libgit2 bugs in rawhide too
> before pushing it to F24.
I am confused now, I thought libgit2-glib needed libgit 0.24.0 ? Or is the
libgit2-glib that needs the newer libgit2 not in the update yet?
Right; a libgit2-glib 0.24.0 update would have to go out together with a
libgit2 update. I don't intend to include that in the GNOME 3.20.0
megaupdate and would much prefer if we could do these separately. It's
just easier to QA if we can split up things a bit here. (Read: I don't
want subsurface or kate not working blocking my GNOME update going
stable :))
Thanks,
Kalev