Ok, I will prepare libgit2 and related packages update in one week for f24.

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:39 PM Kalev Lember <kalevlember@gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 03/21/2016 07:28 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> This time it was easy. They didn't break anything. Should I build it in
>>> f24-gnome? Because libgit2-glib requires it and itself it required by
>>> some other gnome packages.
>>
>> I think it's easier if we can do the gnome and libgit2 updates separately.
>>
>> Can you wait with this until we are out of the alpha freeze and gnome
>> 3.20.0 builds have gone stable? Like, until early next week or so? This
>> should give it a bit time to shake out any libgit2 bugs in rawhide too
>> before pushing it to F24.
>
> I am confused now, I thought libgit2-glib needed libgit 0.24.0 ? Or is the
> libgit2-glib that needs the newer libgit2 not in the update yet?

Right; a libgit2-glib 0.24.0 update would have to go out together with a
libgit2 update. I don't intend to include that in the GNOME 3.20.0
megaupdate and would much prefer if we could do these separately. It's
just easier to QA if we can split up things a bit here. (Read: I don't
want subsurface or kate not working blocking my GNOME update going
stable :))

Thanks,
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--

-Igor Gnatenko