On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and no
>> I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in a
>> just remove them?
> Upload it to fedorahosted, gitorious, github, or whatever. Even if
> you're the only person with access initially, it's still useful as a
> possible code sharing mechanism with other distributions, etc. And
> who knows, maybe someone will come along and submit patches.
Sounds reasonable. Thank you.
Or forget the netkit source. I'd like to see ftp(1) replaced with the
NetBSD ftp client:
Used to be called lukemftp a long time ago. Much nicer than netkit ftp
but still simple and works like people expect the BSD ftp(1) command to
David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com>
Supervisor, Installer Engineering Team
Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT